វិគីភីឌា:Copyright problems៖ ភាពខុសគ្នារវាងកំណែនានា

ខ្លឹមសារដែលបានលុបចោល ខ្លឹមសារដែលបានសរសេរបន្ថែម
បានបង្កើតទំព័រដែលផ្ដើមដោយ An IMPORTANT page! (Which should be created, for the safty of many) **What should I do if I find a copyright violation...
ស្លាក: meta spam id កែ​សម្រួល​តាម​ទូរស័ព្ទ កំណែប្រែពីអ៊ីនធើណិតចល័ត
 
Addition for information
ស្លាក: កែ​សម្រួល​តាម​ទូរស័ព្ទ កំណែប្រែពីអ៊ីនធើណិតចល័ត
 
បន្ទាត់ទី១៖
An IMPORTANT page! (Which should be created, for the safty of many)
 
**'What should I do if I find a copyright violation on Wikipedia?**'
 
**'We take this very seriously**'. We try hard to keep copyright violations out of Wikipedia, but we don't always succeed. If you are the copyright holder, go to Wikipedia:Request for immediate removal of copyright violation; otherwise, go to Wikipedia:Copyright problems and report the instance in question.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#What_should_I_do_if_I_find_a_copyright_violation_on_Wikipedia?
 
➞ In almost all cases, you may not copy text from other sources into Wikipedia. Doing so is a copyright violation and may constitute plagiarism. Always write the articles in your own words and cite the sources of the article.
 
 
___
 
Significant case, on the very base of righteousness:
 
About 50 books have been copy and past from privat pages without any legitimate giving so!
 
Valued wiki-Khmer collective,
Line ១៣ ⟶ ១៩:
My person writes to you guessing that Nyom might be certain responsible for Khmer imputs on Wikipedia or knows well how or whom to approach in this regard.
 
There has been added a huge amount of Tipitaka ( https://km.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ព្រះត្រៃបិដក ), which is violating not only Wikipedia rules but also copy right, not to speak of kamic effect.
 
To put the text of the Tipitaka into ownership of wikipedia and to make it in that way even to an object of commerc and trade is simply stealing.