វិគីភីឌា:សារ ទំព័រគំរូ/Disputes
Dispute templates are used to alert other editors that work is needed on a certain article, and auto-categorize pages so that patrolling editors can aid their talent to the problem. The primary purpose of this page is to display and discuss the use of these sometimes controversial aids to joint edit collaboration.
They should normally not be used without a clear description from the applying editor of the rationale, preferably presented in a numbered list form on the article's talk page, in a section which includes the name of the template that was applied. As these items are dealt with, it is suggested each line be struck through. Some guidance should be given by the posting editor as to what action will resolve the matter when using section and article (page) tagging templates.
It is preferable that in-line templates be applied to content that is being objected to on bias or fact grounds. Inline templates are preferred because they can be attached directly to disputed sentences. Section templates follow next in preference to tagging a whole article.
Many editors consider use of any banner template in an article a serious measure of last resort, and would prefer other measures be exhausted before such detractions from the project be used. If one must be used, please make a thorough note listing deficiencies or items being disputed in bulleted or numbered paragraph format under a clear notice section heading on the article's talk page.
Please remember to use these appropriately, and use the most specific messages you can find for the situation.
សម្រាប់ដាក់ នៅខាងលើគេបង្អស់នៃអត្ថបទ
កែប្រែWhat to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Contradict}} |
|
Self-contradicting article top | ||
{{Contradict-other|[[Article]]}} |
|
One or both contradicting articles top | ||
{{Disputed}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||
{{Dispute about|'''The topic of dispute'''}} |
Disputed articles with list of topics top | |||
{{Disputed-category}} |
Disputed articles top | |||
{{Hoax}} |
Suspected hoaxes top | |||
{{Neologism}} |
Possible neologisms top | |||
{{Notability|
|
|
Non-notable topic, listing the specific guideline at issue top | ||
{{Notability}} |
|
Non-notable topic or failing to meet the current notability guidelines (verbose) top | ||
{{POV}} |
|
Disputed articles top | ||
{{POV-check}} |
|
Possibly biased articles top | ||
{{POV-title}} |
|
Disputed article sections under title | ||
{{Unencyclopedic}} |
|
Articles with unencyclopedic topic (not unused, although it may be redundant) top | ||
{{Unbalanced}} |
|
Articles which contain Unbalanced citations. | ||
{{Autobiography|date-flagged}} Edit Talk |
Articles which are autobiographies and may not be NPOV because of that, with the date at which they were flagged. |
សម្រាប់ដាក់ នៅខាងលើគេបង្អស់នៃអត្ថបទ ឬខាងលើផ្នែកនិមួយៗ
កែប្រែWhat to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Multiple issues}} |
|
Top of article or section with three or more issues | ||
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
Top of article, section, or talk page | |||
{{Unreferenced}} |
|
Lacks attributions from reliable sources. See template page for special usages. | ||
{{Refimprove}} |
|
Possibly inaccurate articles top | ||
{{Cite check}} |
At the top of an article or section where the text misrepresents the sources cited. | |||
{{Original research}} |
|
Possible original research. | ||
{{Synthesis}} |
Possible unpublished synthesis. (The text in quotation marks is replaced with the title of the article.) | |||
{{Science review}} |
Top of articles or sections | |||
{{Advert}} |
|
Pages that promote commercial products or services | ||
{{Magazine}} |
Pages that read like a magazine article instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. | |||
{{Fanpov}} |
Pages that read like a fansite instead of the formal tones expected of an encyclopedia. | |||
{{Story}} |
|
Pages that read like a narrative and tell a story rather than providing encyclopedic information. | ||
{{Content}} |
Above the site of dispute in article or section | |||
{{weasel}} |
|
Article or section that has weasel words | ||
{{peacock}} |
|
Article or section that has peacock terms | ||
{{Missing information|Info}} |
|
Article or section where information not present may be worthy of inclusion | ||
{{Self-published|Source}} |
|
On an article where a self-published (online or in print) source is cited, and is therefore not legitimately citable as a secondary source, according to policy. | ||
{{Incoherent}} |
|
Section where some sentences in a section or the text as a whole does not relay an understandable message | ||
{{Need-Consensus}} |
Disputed articles or sections top | |||
{{3o|article}} {{3o|section}} |
Articles or sections where an unresolved discussion exists, and a third opinion has been requested. | |||
{{Recentism}} |
|
Top of article, or top of section in dispute. | ||
{{Undue|article}} {{Undue|section}} {{Emphasis|article}} {{Emphasis|section}} |
|
Sections or text where a matter such as a controversy or incident has been given more weight than is appropriate in the context of the article or biography as a whole. |
សម្រាប់ដាក់ នៅខាងក្នុង ឬខាងលើនៃផ្នែកនិមួយៗ ប៉ុណ្ណោះ
កែប្រែWhat to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Disputed-section}} |
|
Disputed article sections under section header | ||
{{POV-section}} |
|
Disputed article sections under section header | ||
{{SectOR}} |
Section contains possible original research. | |||
{{POV-intro}} |
|
Disputed article intro top | ||
{{Expand section}} |
|
Top of section to be expanded. |
For inline article placement
កែប្រែWhat to type | What it makes | Where it goes |
---|---|---|
{{fact}}, {{cn}} or {{citation needed}} |
[ប្រភព?] |
After factual claims that need a citation to back them up. in-line |
{{Verify source}} or {{Check}} |
After suspect citations or source references in-line | |
{{Lopsided}} |
One-sided statements in-line | |
{{Verify credibility}} |
After suspect citations or source references in-line | |
{{Dubious}} |
[សង្ស័យ ] |
Disputed statements in-line |
{{failed verification}} |
After factual claims that have been checked and not found in the indicated source. Explain in Talk. in-line | |
{{or}} |
After text passages based upon original research in-line | |
{{syn}} |
After text passages based upon improper synthesis in-line | |
{{Nonspecific}} or {{Unverifiable}} |
[not specific enough to verify] |
After factual claims that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a {{fact}}. in-line |
{{Who}} |
[នរណា?] |
After passages mentioning general groups (such as "many scientists") that could be made more specific by naming (and citing sources for) specific individuals. in-line |
{{POV-statement}} |
[neutrality is disputed] | after passages that appear to have a non-neutral point of view. |
For placement on talk pages of articles
កែប្រែWhat to type | What it makes | Where it goes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{Calm talk}} |
|
Talk pages which are likely to have incivil or hot-headed disputes. | ||
{{ActiveDiscuss}} |
Top of article, section, or talk page | |||
{{pbneutral}} |
|
Talk page top | ||
{{Controversial}} |
|
Talk page top | ||
{{Controversial-issues}} |
Talk page top |
For placement on talk pages of users
កែប្រែSee also
កែប្រែ
|