វិគីភីឌា:របៀបរៀបរយ

(ត្រូវបានបញ្ជូនបន្តពី វិគីភីឌា:ការសម្អាត)
ផ្លូវកាត់s:
WP:CLEAN
WP:CLEANUP

Welcome to the Wikipedia Cleanup project. This project is intended as a resource for Wikipedia Cleanup information and discussion. Cleanup issues that this project covers may include wikification, spelling, grammar, tone, and sourcing.

Lists of pages requiring cleanup are automatically generated from the {{cleanup}} banners placed on articles. See Category:All pages needing cleanup and Category:Cleanup by month. Older articles with issues that have not been dealt with in some time may be found at Wikipedia:BACKLOG. If you've arrived at this page from a link on a {{cleanup}} template that someone placed on your article, it most likely was because the article does not meet one or more of Wikipedia's standards on content and style. Try reading Wikipedia:Writing better articles to get a sense of what our standards are. The advice on that page should help you effectively clean up any article.

Resources សម្រាប់តំហែទាំ និងសហប្រតិបត្តិការ
ការបោសសំអាត វិគីគម្រោង Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons - Articles needing cleanup - Articles needing attention - Template messages - Copy to Wiktionary - Notability Sorting - English grammar - Copyediting - Spam - Wikify an article - Deorphan an article - Update an article - Progress boxes
ចំណាត់ថ្នាក់ក្រុម General cleanup - Articles to be categorized - Underpopulated - Uncategorized categories - Other reports on categories
បង្កើត-សរសេរអត្ថបទថ្មី Most wanted - Requests 1 year+ - Requested articles - Short pages - Missing encyclopedic topics - Review anonymous article submissions
Referencing Fact-check - Articles lacking sources - Need more references - Original research
អត្ថបទខ្លីមិនពេញលេញ (Stubs) Advice - Stubs by topic - Most wanted - Short pages - Incomplete lists - Long stubs - Stubs included directly in stub categories
ការលុបចោល Speedy - Articles - Categories - Redirects - Templates - Misc. pages - Stub templates and categories - Log - Discussion archives - Review
Polishing Peer review - Featured candidates - Fill a topic list
ការបកប្រែទៅជាភាសាខ្មែរ វិគីភីឌា:Translation - Existing pages - Spanish trans. of the week - វិគីភីឌា:Dump reports/Missing articles
រូបភាព Requested pictures - Images for cleanup - Caption review - Images with missing articles - Other reports on files
Controversy Neutrality - Article accuracy - Statement accuracy
To-do lists Articles - គម្រោង - សៀវភៅ
Disambiguation Disambiguation - Manual of Style Disambiguation - Hatnotes - Templates
ផ្សេងៗទៀត Active wiki fixup projects - Open tasks - Articles to merge - Articles to split - Copyright violations - Requests - Backlogs - Expert request sorting - Missing names - Reports on redirects - unused templates

All users are welcome to help in editing or fixing any page on these lists. Please remember to take the appropriate tag(s) off the page when you have completed cleaning an article, then strike-out or remove the entry from this page. Please also document what you have done on the article's talk page for the reference of other editors.

Information on the cleanup process may be found at Wikipedia:Cleanup process. Other resources may be found at Wikipedia: Cleanup resources and Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup, for help on posting problems with Wikipedia pages, or for you to use as a guide.

For 2007 and 2008 listings, scroll to the bottom of the page and expand the collapsed bar.

New posts go at the top.

1) The bulk of the article has been written by an editor or editors who struggle with the English language. 2) The name of a photo is given, but the photo is absent 3) Many of the wikilinks for the movies he has appeared in link to the wrong pages. 4) The article needs more references. Thanks for any help! Montgomery is a notable indie film actor and producer but his article is a mess. AlaskaMike (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Still needs attention, but some copyedit and DAB resolution complete. Haruth (talk) 00:00, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Fischertechnik It talks too much about other companies' products and lacks sections that would seperate the different subjects it details.
  • Green-water navy This article is wrong on so many levels. To start with, the list of green-water navies by alphabetical order has about 5 navies in it, the list probably shouldn't be there at all, as it would list every single navy in the world, bar four. Also globalsecurity.org doesn't seem like a very reliable source. On another angle, the style is rather rubbish as well.